Declare Me Kogi Governor-Elect Now, Late Audu’s Running Mate Writes INEC

It’s a long read, but you will enjoy it.

The running mate to late Abubakar Audu, the candidate of the
All Progressives Congress in Saturday’s governorship election in Kogi State,
has asked the Independent National Electoral 

Commission, INEC, to declare him
governor elect.

James Faleke, in a November 26 letter to INEC Chairman,
Mahmood Yakubu, insisted that under Section 187 of the 1999 Constitution, he
was duly elected as deputy governor of Kogi State.

While expressing sadness over the demise of his principal,
Abubakar Audu, the deputy governorship candidate said INEC had no right under
the law to declare the election inconclusive.

He accused INEC of deliberately creating what he called
“legal conundrum” and urged the APC not to be a party to the action.

“In law and logic, no new candidate can inherit or be a
beneficiary of the votes already cast, counted and declared by INEC before that
candidate was nominated and purportedly sponsored,” Mr. Faleke wrote through
his counsel, Wole Olanipekun.

“Assuming without conceding that INEC is even right to order
a supplementary election, the votes already cast, counted and declared on
Saturday, 25th November 2015, were votes for the joint constitutional ticket of
Prince Abubakar Audu and our client.

“Therefore, no new or ‘supplementary’ candidate can hijack,
aggregate, appropriate or inherit the said votes.”

In another letter to APC Chairman, John Oyegun, Mr. Faleke
urged his party to distance itself from the “Greek Gift” being offered to it to
nominate a new candidate for a planned supplementary election in 91 polling
units.

He said the election had already been won and lost, and that
the party should rather support him in actualizing the mandate already given to
APC and its candidates.

According to the result declared by INEC, Mr. Audu had the
highest number of votes thus leading the 21 other candidates, including the
incumbent governor of Kogi State, Idris Wada, who was the flagbearer of the
Peoples Democratic Party.

However, INEC declared the election inconclusive and ordered
supplementary election in 91 polling units.   

The Commission also said on Tuesday that despite the demise
of Mr. Audu, it would go ahead with the supplementary election and advised the
APC to nominate a replacement for the late APC candidate.

The APC, on its part, resolved to organise a fresh primary
election to pick a new candidate for the supplementary election fixed for
December 5.

But in his three-page letter to INEC, Mr. Faleke argued that
in accordance with the Electoral Act and INEC Guidelines/Regulations, results
of the election were declared, first at the polling unit level, then at the
ward level and later at the local government level.

He said as the declaration was made by the electoral body,
it was simultaneously relayed and announced on radio and television stations,
both private and public, as well as on social media

He also said the necessary INEC forms, including but not
limited to Forms ECBA, ECBB, and ECBC were filled, signed and made available to
the respective political parties which participated at the election.

Stating that the election to the office of the governor is
regulated by sections 178 and 179 of the Constitution while nomination to the
office is regulated by Section 187 of the document, Mr. Faleke insisted the
election had been completed in accordance with the provisions of the
constitution. 

“Therefore, INEC has no alternative or discretion other than
to announce the result of the election and declare our client as the winner,”
he said.

“With much respect to INEC under your very distinguished
chairmanship, the reasons given by INEC to declare the election as inconclusive
are alien to the constitution and, therefore unconstitutional.

“With further respect to INEC, cancellation of election
result by it cannot be a ground for declaring any election as inconclusive.

“INEC is enjoined to declare a winner of an election based
on lawful votes cast. Thus, the cancelled results by INEC for whatever reasons
and assuming without conceding that INEC could legitimately cancel such
results, amount to unlawful votes, in effect, INEC cannot declare a well
concluded election as inconclusive based on unlawful votes.”

Mr. Faleke said INEC’s wrong declaration of the result as
inconclusive had no nexus with the passing on of Mr. Audu.

He advised that INEC “should not confuse the situation with
what it intended in Section 33 of the Electoral Act because the situation on
ground has nothing to do with changing or substitution of the name of a
candidate before election.”

He added, “Mr. Chairman Sir, this is a rather simple and
straightforward matter which does not need any delay, foot dragging or
procrastination. It is a constitutional imperative.

“Put in another way, INEC has a burden duty to declare our
client as the winner of the election. Any attempt to conduct any supplementary
election in any unit whatsoever and howsoever will amount to INEC breaching and
flouting the constitution, and our client will definitely challenge it.”

In the letter addressed to the National Chairman of the APC,
John Oyegun, Mr. Olanipekun, on behalf of Mr. Faleke,  said the scores already announced for APC was
final and binding.

He suggested that by parity of reasoning, the APC should be
declared the winner of the election while Mr. Faleke is declared as
governor-elect.

He said, “Arising from the foregoing our client enjoins the
APC not only to support him (Faleke) at actualizing the mandate already given
to the party under the joint ticket of himself and the late Prince Abubakar
Audu, but to also distance itself from the “Greek gift” offer being made by
INEC, to wit, that it is allowing the APC to conduct a fresh primary election
to nominate a candidate for a supplementary election in 91 polling units where
only about 25,000 PVCs are available: whereas the APC is already leading by the
announced results with over 40,000 votes.

“In parenthesis, we urge the APC, under your able
leadership, to speedily look into and act on our client’s position as
stipulated in this letter.”

Premium Times