Court Orders Arrest Of Edo Deputy Police Commissioner

    An Edo State High Court sitting in Benin, has ordered the
    state Commissioner of Police, Mr. Funsho Adebanjo to arrest the state Deputy
    Commissioner of Police in charge of Criminal Investigation Department, CID, Mr.
    Joshua Ibine, for allegedly releasing accused persons on bail, while their
    application for bail was pending before the court.
    The Deputy Commissioner of Police was also alleged to have
    flouted the order of the court to produce the accused persons in court when the
    matter came up for hearing, yesterday.

    The accused persons, Osas Osawe, Peter Aruyinmwen, Stephen
    Osabuohien, Godwin Igbinijesu, Ogbegie Michael, Osaigbovo Ehigiamusoe, Joseph
    Igbinijesu and others at large, were alleged to have conspired among themselves
    to demolish buildings of the traditional ruler of Evboewedo (Enogie Osarenogowu
    Onaghise), and other houses through rioting on November 19, 2012.
    They are facing an 18- count charge of conspiracy to commit
    felony, contrary to and punishable under section 516 A of the Criminal Code Act
    Cap. C38 of the Laws of the Federation 2004, as applicable in Edo State.
    Trial judge, Justice J. Oyomire, who gave the order after
    hearing prosecuting counsel, said: “In view of the refusal, failure and or
    neglect of the Deputy Commissioner of Police in charge of State Criminal
    Investigation Department, Benin City, who released the accused persons on bail
    while their bail pending trial by the defence counsel is still pending and yet
    to be argued in this court to produce the accused persons in court as ordered
    on 7/2/2014.
    “It is ordered and I hereby order the Commissioner of
    Police, Edo State, to arrest the Deputy Commissioner of Police in charge of
    State Investigation Department.”
    The judge ordered that upon arrest, the Deputy Commissioner
    of Police should be brought to his court to explain to the court’s
    satisfaction, why contempt proceedings should not be brought against him.

    “He is to explain where he derived the authority to release
    the accused persons, whose case is still pending before this court without any
    consent or authorisation of this court and for his failure to produce the
    accused persons in court as ordered,” the judge said.

    Follow Us on Facebook – @LadunLiadi; Instagram – @LadunLiadi; Twitter – @LadunLiadi; Youtube – @LadunLiadiTV for updates

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here